A national CPG company wanted to assess the purchase barriers and how to alleviate those barriers for one of their most popular sausage products.
The company first conducted an online metaphor elicitation exercise, a System 1 methodology, to determine the drivers and barriers to usage in the category. The online metaphor elicitation results uncovered both expected and more nuanced findings.
In order to prioritize their efforts, the client needed to understand the size of each barrier and the impact of alleviation among lapsed and non-buyers.
MDRG solved this ask with a two-phase approach:
Tapping into the consumer’s decision-making process through both System 1 and System 2 is what sets MDRG apart. In Phase I, MDRG deployed an online survey to 519 respondents and asked questions don't change the System 2 objectives of:
To bypass what consumers think via rational thought processes and uncover some of the emotional associations of the brand and category, MDRG executed a Prediction Market exercise with 733 consumers in the survey. System 1 objectives included:
Within a prediction market, truly engaged participants “bet virtual currency” on how a targeted audience will behave, not on their personal preferences. Predication markets use “gamification” to engage participants. As a result, prediction markets have a history of more accurately predicting real world events than traditional surveys
Participants are encouraged to “self-select” and only answer questions where they have enough knowledge to make a judgement. Participants answer not only with their own “opinion”, but also “judgement” on how a target audience will behave, and their rationale about “why”. Prediction markets are often used to predict future trends, optimize agile marketing concepts, and test early stage ideas and concepts.
Prediction Markets yield the following predictive metrics:
In Phase I, MDRG tested 44 potential barriers to buying the sausage product. After determining the size of each barrier, MDRG and the client selected 18 barriers to test in Phase II, the prediction market.
The barriers fell into one of the following categories:
MDRG developed a method to analyze the data graphically by plotting the each barrier’s size from Phase I on the x-axis, and the predicted in-market success rates of each barrier from Phase II on the y-axis.
The top right quadrant represents larger barriers with alleviation tactics that have high predicted in-market success. These are considered the Top Tier barriers, and ones MDRG definitely recommends attacking using the proposed solution or one similar and should expect obvious results.
The top left quadrant represents barriers with a smaller stated size/prevalence in the market, but with alleviation tactics that have relatively high in-market success rates. These are considered Tier 2 barriers, and ones MDRG recommends attacking after or in tandem with the Tier 1 barriers, with equal or less resource allocation. These barriers may not be obvious to all, but could significantly change consumer behavior and purchase intent.